ANSTHRLD - What do we need to know?

[Dr Tiomoid M. of Angle]

- --- Donald Riney <dariusobells at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Would there be any problem with just calling them "Pursuivants".
> Skipping 
> the "extraordinary" or "at large" altogether? After all branch
> officers will 
> be identified by their branch name or branch heraldic title. For
> example 
> Lindenwood Pursuivant or Nautilus Pursuivant, where as one not
> attached to a 
> group could just be a pursuivant.

That certainly does no damage to the historical paradigm. "Pursuivant"
implies that the person is not an heraldic expert, still learning, but
has a minimal amount of knowledge -- and that about descibes the sort
of people who would be put in that situation. Works for me....

Tadhg, Hanaper
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.