Joseph Percer jpercer at stx.rr.com
Wed Jul 2 20:14:18 PDT 2003


If I'm not mistaken, The 11/02 was the date that the item was written into
the Internal letter - so that's the date the submission was presented to the
kingdom for commentary... They've got a month to comment, and then the
submission was reviewed at the January meeting, and published to Laurel in
the February 2003 Letter of Intent... So to get an idea of when it's going
to appear, look for the 02/2003 LOI.

In service,

Jayme Dominguez del Valle
Pursuivant, Shire of Seawinds

-----Original Message-----
From: heralds-bounces at ansteorra.org
[mailto:heralds-bounces at ansteorra.org]On Behalf Of Bill Butler
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 22:06
To: Heralds List, Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc.
Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] March LoAR

I did notice the - as a matter of fact, but
Atenveldt, as an example, also had the dreaded -
while they did have something listed in the LoAR.
Caid had the - but they also had  none listed in
the LoAR, and Ansteorra had nothing listed at all.  I
was a little confused by all this and so I asked the
question, believing the only stupid question is the
one un-asked.

So, if a submission has the following notation, is it
being considered based on the 11/02, 1/03, or 2/03

ILoI 11/02
Kingdom accepted 1/03 (AG 2/03).

I would have expected it to be considered based on the
11/02 date but now

Im so confused!!!!


--- Jennifer Smith <jds at randomgang.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 06:18:21PM -0700, Bill
> Butler wrote:
> > OK, I've checked the newly posted LoAR on the
> Society
> > site.  As a mater of fact, I've checked it twice.
> I
> > have not found anything there from Ansteorra.  Did
> I
> > miss something or did the Kingdom just not get
> > anything through on the March edition?
> We had nothing.  If you'll check the cover letter
> you'll notice
> the second column is for the March meetings, and
> Ansteorra has a big "-"
> in that column as our "Letter of Intent being
> considered".  You'll also
> notice that our Dec 18 letter was scheduled for the
> April meetings.
> A glance at the "Status of ILoIs" table in the
> gazette shows that the
> normal November LoI was combined with the December
> LoI, so that explains
> why we had nothing in the March Laurel letter.
> -Emma de Fetherstan
> --
> Jennifer Smith
> jds at randomgang.com
> _______________________________________________
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at ansteorra.org
> http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/heralds

Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
Heralds mailing list
Heralds at ansteorra.org

More information about the Heralds mailing list