[ANSTHRLD] March LoAR
Sara L Friedemann
liana at ellipsis.cx
Wed Jul 2 20:15:11 PDT 2003
Quoth Bill Butler:
> I did notice the - as a matter of fact, but
> Atenveldt, as an example, also had the dreaded -
> while they did have something listed in the LoAR.
> Caid had the - but they also had none listed in
> the LoAR,
That's because if you look under Caid Returns, a pended
item was returned. That's why it warranted a "None"
under the Acceptances.
> So, if a submission has the following notation, is it
> being considered based on the 11/02, 1/03, or 2/03
> ILoI 11/02
> Kingdom accepted 1/03 (AG 2/03).
> I would have expected it to be considered based on the
> 11/02 date but now
Things are always considered based upon the date of the
letter sent out to the College of Arms (barring non-receipt
of submissions packet by Laurel).
vita sine literis mors est
More information about the Heralds