[ANSTHRLD] March LoAR

[Sara L Friedemann]

Quoth Bill Butler:
> I did notice the “-“ as a matter of fact, but
> Atenveldt, as an example, also had the dreaded “-“
> while they did have something listed in the LoAR. 
> Caid had the “-“ but they also had  “none” listed in
> the LoAR, 

That's because if you look under Caid Returns, a pended
item was returned.  That's why it warranted a "None"
under the Acceptances.

> So, if a submission has the following notation, is it
> being considered based on the 11/02, 1/03, or 2/03
> date? 
> 
> ILoI 11/02 
> Kingdom accepted 1/03 (AG 2/03).
> 
> I would have expected it to be considered based on the
> 11/02 date but now…

Things are always considered based upon the date of the
letter sent out to the College of Arms (barring non-receipt
of submissions packet by Laurel).

-ARyanhwy


 
-- 
vita sine literis mors est
http://www.ellipsis.cx/~liana/