[ANSTHRLD] is there a precendent banning this?

[Ron Knight]

Luciana:
> Is there a precedent that specifically makes displaying a charge
'issuant
> from the line of division' an 'insta-boing'? 

Greetings from Modar!

I have not heard of such a precedent being set...and do not find 
such from a search ( http://www.sca.org/heraldry/laurel/precedents.html
).   

And while previous registration does not guarantee current 
registrations there have been recent registrations that 
would seem to indicate that such is still allowed:

Caroline Marie de Fontenailles (registered July 2005 via Atenveldt):
Per chevron azure and gules, a demi-sun issuant from the line of 
division Or and a bordure ermine.

Maximilian Petsch (registered May 2005 via AEthelmearc):
Per fess embattled gules and azure, a demi-horse issuant from 
the line of division argent.

Sarah Preston (registered May 2005 via An Tir):
Per fess azure and gules, in pale a demi-sun throughout issuant 
from the line of division and a unicorn contourny Or.

Adam Stedefast (registered Feb 2004 via the Outlands):
Per chevron azure and sable, a phoenix Or rising from flames 
proper issuant from the line of division and a rose argent.

Isabel de la Hay (registered Jan 2004 via the West):
Per fess argent and vert ermined argent, a sea-serpent ondoyant 
and issuant from the line of division azure.


I hope this information has been of some assistance.

In Service,

Modar
===============
Modar's Heraldry Page
http://www2.kumc.edu/itc/staff/rknight/Heraldry.htm