[ANSTHRLD] is there a precendent banning this?

[Tim McDaniel]

On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Luciana Caterina di Borgese <dolce.luce at gmail.com> wrote:
> Blazon: "Per fess argent and azure, a demi-eagle displayed issuant from the
> line of division and three cross formy two and one counterchanged".
>
> Is there a precedent that specifically makes displaying a charge 'issuant
> from the line of division' an 'insta-boing'?

I don't think I've ever heard of one, but you can check precedents
somewhere under http://sca.org/heraldry

DdL
-- 
Tim McDaniel, tmcd at panix.com