[ANSTHRLD] Advice on two blazons

Mike Wyvill wyvillmike at hotmail.com
Thu Apr 5 11:58:43 PDT 2007


Apparently attachments are stripped. I will have to post this device to a 
site so you may see it. As my employers security is set so that I cannot 
access such sites I will post this evening.


>From: "Mike Wyvill" <wyvillmike at hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: "Heralds List, Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA,  Inc." 
><heralds at lists.ansteorra.org>
>To: heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
>Subject: [ANSTHRLD] Advice on two blazons
>Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 18:55:23 +0000
>
>First a relatively simply blazon. I have looked over the ICC for January 
>regarding charges over field divisions where the charge obscures the 
>division between two colors. This device does not have a complex line 
>division but the same two colors are involved.
>
>Per bend gules and sable, a cross crosslet argent.
>
>Do you see any potential problems?
>
>Second, and this is the example attached, I have a device that a gentle has 
>asked me to submit for her. I want to make sure that I have blazoned it 
>correctly. I know from a previous conversation that the colors need to be 
>separated. So here is how I would blazon that device. Feel free to shoot 
>holes in it as necessary.
>
>Purpure, a rhomb sable fimbriated argent and on a base dancetty a coney 
>argent.
>
>Thank you.
>
>Engenulf de Vienville
>


>_______________________________________________
>Heralds mailing list
>Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
>http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org





More information about the Heralds mailing list