[ANSTHRLD] Blazon advice

Mike Wyvill wyvillmike at hotmail.com
Wed May 2 15:01:01 PDT 2007

I ma thankfull that everone has responded. However I guess my followup email 
didn't make it to the list. The carp are naiant not uriant.

Thanks again


>From: Britt <tierna.britt at gmail.com>
>Reply-To: "Heralds List, Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA,  Inc." 
><heralds at lists.ansteorra.org>
>To: "Alasdair MacEogan" <alasdair at bmhanson.net>,"Heralds List, Kingdom of 
>Ansteorra - SCA,  Inc." <heralds at lists.ansteorra.org>
>Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] Blazon advice
>Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 12:59:15 -0700
> > Azure, two roaches uriant on a chief engrailed argent an arrow vert.
>Azure, two roach rish urinant and on a chief engrailed argent an arrow 
>Connective conjunctions make the blazon flow better.
>Stylewise this is fine - color field with metal charges, standard
>posture, etc.  The one and only roach was registered in 1980 and was
>called a 'roach fish', which is why I changed the blazon. If it's for
>a cant, it'll likely be kept providing something in the depiction
>makes them actually roaches, otherwise you might get a blazon change.
>Fish are excellent canting charges because there are so many different
>I checked for conflict, as well.  This armory qualifies for X.2. with
>only two types of charge lying directly on the field and no overall
>charges.  Fish types get at most significant difference, but not
>substantial, so that meant wading through the fish categories (pun
>blatantly intended) plus a check against fish-tailed monsters.
>I found nothing that conflicts.
>- Teceangl
>Heralds mailing list
>Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org

More information about the Heralds mailing list