[ANSTHRLD] [Fwd: Heraldry announcement for Commentary
kevinkeary at aol.com
kevinkeary at aol.com
Thu Jul 10 11:10:31 PDT 2008
I know they are separate issues and separate proposals, but the two
issues in this request for commentary ARE related by what Robin points
out as the single argument in favor of thsi requirement: A laurel
wreath marks a device as territorial arms. If members of the Order of
the Laurel are permitted to include a laurel wreath in their arms --
and there's no logical reason for denying them this given the fact that
the other peerages and nobility can use THEIR symbols of rank -- then
that utility is gone anyway. If you see a device you are unfamiliar
with that includes a laurel wreath, it might be territorial arms OR
those of a Laurel peer.
From: Jay Rudin <rudin at ev1.net>
To: Heralds List, Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc.
<heralds at lists.ansteorra.org>
Sent: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:04 am
Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] [Fwd: Heraldry announcement for Commentary]
> Not being a member of the CoA, can anyone provide a summary
> of the argument(s) in favor of eliminating the Laurel Wreath from >
Well, I'm not a member of the College of Arms, either, but the basic
argument is fairly straightforward:
Requiring a Laurel wreath is a non-heraldic, non-historical,
non-authentic bureaucratic requirement that usually forces more complex
(and therefore worse) heraldry. It makes it harder for new groups to
design20armory, and harder for people to create banners and other
It is, in every relevant way, a violation of the College's charge to
encourage good, authentic armory.
English baronies don't have to use Lions. French shires don't have to
use fleurs-de-lys. Castilian cities don't have to use castles.
It doesn't serve the people, or the branches, or the CoA, or the
corporation, in any relevant way.
Sometimes we allow non-period options, as in the Mundane Name
Allowance, to serve the people of the SCA. Sometimes we require
non-period restrictions, like unique names, for bureaucratic
simplicity. But there's no reason to force a non-period restriction
that gets in people's way, makes good heraldry *harder* to design, and
serves no actual purpose.
The only argument in favor of requiring a Laurel wreath is that it
marks our branches as SCA branches. That's true. "Look --bad, overly
complex, non-period heraldry -- it must be the SCA!"
I'm all in favor of striking down this useless holdover rule from the
1960s, when the SCA registered Elvish names and stars as place-names.
Robin of Gilwell / Jay Rudin
Heralds mailing list
Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
More information about the Heralds