[ANSTHRLD] (no subject)
Tim McDaniel
tmcd at panix.com
Tue Oct 21 16:16:32 PDT 2008
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Childers, Jeff <Jeff.Childers at ttuhsc.edu> wrote:
> http://ganglia.ttuhsc.edu/~jchilder/
>
> I know only the VERY basics of heraldry.
>
> I have done my best to blazon it. But on the image you see the 4 quills
> I am not sure exactly how to word it.
"Difficulty in blazon can be an indication of non-period style."
(Or not knowing enough blazon.) I don't know of a way to blazon this.
The middle two alone would be "in saltire crossed at the nibs" or some
such. If there were three or four bunched closer together, it might
be something like "a sheaf of three quill pens crossed at the nibs".
I'd blazon it
Per chevron raguly sable ermined purpure and argent ermined
purpure, a griffin rampant queue forchy contourney, a
lion rampant queue forchy argent, and 4 quill pens [arrangement
hard to blazon], a bordure lozengy purpure and argent.
Various notes:
- As defined by the College of Arms, a "quill" is something to do with
yarn, and "quill pens" are writing instruments. I *think* a period
quill pen had a small tuft of feather rather than the full ones,
but I think these are still registerable without comment -- but I've
obviously gotten rusty of late.
- you can't register an ermined tincture of "COLOR ermined COLOR".
The ermine spots must have "good contrast": "no color on color,
no metal on metal".
- I'd draw this raguly a little more slanted: to me, they look like
halfway between embattled and raguly. But other people may have
other opinions.
- It's what the SCA calls "slot machine". There are three types of
charge in one charge group (gryphon, lion, and quill pens).
That's not registerable, per
<http://heraldry.sca.org/heraldry/laurel/rfs.html#8.1>
"As another guideline, three or more types of charges should not
be used in the same group."
but that "guideline" in practice is a hard rule.
- It wasn't until I read the blazon that I realized that there was a
griffin and a lion -- I'd glanced over the design quickly. I think
there's enough difference in types to avoid a return for "sword and
dagger", as the CoA Glossary of Terms
(<http://heraldry.sca.org/heraldry/coagloss.html>) puts it:
Sword and Dagger rule.
The popular name given to rulings which disallow the use of
similar but non-identical charges together on the field or
in the same charge group. In Gules, a dragon and a wyvern
combattant argent the dragon and the wyvern are both on the
field, and are similar but not identical; therefore this
design violates the rule. ...
The difference here is "artistic only": wyverns and dragons get no
difference, they're just drawn with different numbers of legs.
Griffins and lions were distinguished in period.
Nevertheless, I think you should consider whether you want two
charges so similar on the same design, with the visual confustion it
may cause, without regard to whether it's legal or not.
- The bordure basically shares a tincture with half the field (argent
versus ermine). I'd have to look at precedents to see whether
that's registerable.
- <http://heraldry.sca.org/heraldry/laurel/rfs.html#8.1>
As a rule of thumb, the total of the number of tinctures plus
the number of types of charges in a design should not exceed
eight.
This design is right at the border:
griffin + lion + quill pens + bordure +
sable-ermined-purpure + argent-ermined-purpure + argent + purpure
(Furs count as a separate tincture.)
But I found this design to be more complicated visually than the
blazon or the "rule of thumb complexity" would indicate.
Perhaps it's the lines slanting at various angles; maybe it's the
disparate charge types.
I'd suggest that you look through some period armory and see what
things were done in period. Foster's book, for example, shows earlier
period armory pretty much. If you do want complexity, you might look
up Tudor armory.
> If you want to tell me what it is that's great BUT if you know of
> some resources that discuss this I would like to understand the
> concept behind clustered items to make a charge.
I'm sorry that I haven't the time at the moment to suggest where to
read up on the art of armory and blazonry.
Danihel de Lindocollino
--
Tim McDaniel, tmcd at panix.com
More information about the Heralds
mailing list