[ANSTHRLD] Heraldic Heirs
Alasdair MacEogan
alasdair at bmhanson.net
Wed Feb 4 14:03:37 PST 2009
Marie de Blois <erminespot at gmail.com> wrote:
> No need to be snippy - I misread 'device' where you wrote 'armory'.
> Given that 'armory includes both devices and badges, it is still worth
> noting that the branch -device- couldn't be transferred, even if
> badges could be.
My apologies. I was not trying to be snippy. I was merely trying to emphasize the word. I guess I could have said _device_ but I am not sure you would have taken that any differently. Again my apologies if it was read as such.
> It would be interesting to see if Laurel would even accept such a
> heraldic will, though personally, I'd think it was presumptuous and
> tacky. What's the harm in letting the kingdom hold onto them? They
> can't be released without some significant work.
I see no harm nor have any real reason for asking other than academic curiosity. I was curious. The Admin Handbook does not specify one way or the other. It merely refers to the "owner" of the registered item. I apologize if my curiosity offended anyone.
Alasdair
More information about the Heralds
mailing list