[ANSTHRLD] Jbrandl10 conflict check/blazon

[Jacquie Ziegler]

Tim McDaniel wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Alasdair MacEogan <alasdair at bmhanson.net> wrote:
>> RfS VIII.3 "3. Armorial Identifiability" states "Voiding and
>> fimbriation may only be used with simple geometric charges placed in
>> the center of the design".
>
> I've had the impression that that refers to charged *on the field*,
> but I cannot quickly find a precedent.
>
>> I will give you that you meet the center of the shield
>> qualification, but I have been unable (after a brief run through) to
>> find a precedent regarding if a Thor's hammer may be fimbriated.
>
> The defining precedent is the Nov 1992 cover letter, but the on-line
> copy doesn't have the crucial example illustrations and the illos in
> <http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/bruce/bruce.html#fimbriation>
> look mangled in my browser: I see the top half of Fig. A, all of
> Fig. B, and none of Fig. C. In Internet Exploder, I get a little more
> of each, oddly enough. CCing Shauna, Ragged Staff Herald, in case she
> has a scan handy.
>
> Danyell de Lincoln
Huh? *blinks* Oh, you want me to look up the precedents page and see 
what the illustrations look like?

Sure. Give me a little bit and I'll have that available - where should I 
post it?

Shauna