[ANSTHRLD] Jbrandl10 conflict check/blazon
Tim McDaniel
tmcd at panix.com
Thu Aug 5 15:39:52 PDT 2010
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Alasdair MacEogan <alasdair at bmhanson.net> wrote:
> RfS VIII.3 "3. Armorial Identifiability" states "Voiding and
> fimbriation may only be used with simple geometric charges placed in
> the center of the design".
I've had the impression that that refers to charged *on the field*,
but I cannot quickly find a precedent.
> I will give you that you meet the center of the shield
> qualification, but I have been unable (after a brief run through) to
> find a precedent regarding if a Thor's hammer may be fimbriated.
The defining precedent is the Nov 1992 cover letter, but the on-line
copy doesn't have the crucial example illustrations and the illos in
<http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/bruce/bruce.html#fimbriation>
look mangled in my browser: I see the top half of Fig. A, all of
Fig. B, and none of Fig. C. In Internet Exploder, I get a little more
of each, oddly enough. CCing Shauna, Ragged Staff Herald, in case she
has a scan handy.
Danyell de Lincoln
--
Tim McDaniel, tmcd at panix.com
More information about the Heralds
mailing list