[ANSTHRLD] conflict check - natural panther rampant

[Kevinkeary]

Perhaps a link to a picture would help. Otherwise I agree with Daniel. Were this the old snarky days of commentary...

But I'll try: 
Or, a winged natural panther segreant sable wings undercoated gules maintaining a sword argent on a bordure azure semy of pheons inverted Or.


Complexity seven, or nine if maintained charges count for complexity but not difference.

No conflicts noticed.

-----Original Message-----
From: tmcd at panix.com
To: Heralds List, Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA,Inc. <heralds at lists.ansteorra.org>
Sent: Thu, Aug 18, 2011 4:44 pm
Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] conflict check - natural panther rampant


On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, John Atkinson <johnmatkinson at gmail.com> wrote:

 Ioannes

 On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 4:22 PM,  <tmcd at panix.com> wrote:
 > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011, eirik at hot.rr.com wrote:
 >> Or, a winged natural panther
Rampant?  The CoA Glossary of Terms doesn't have a default posture for
eneric felines.
> >> sable maintaining in its front paws
 >> a sword argent
Low contrast, but I think that's OK for a maintained charge.
> >> and on a bordure azure an orle of arrowheads
 >> inverted Or.
 >>
 >> The underside of the wings is red if that is important.
 >
 > I can't think of a heraldic way of saying "winged where the
 > undersides of the wings are gules and the top and leading edges of
 > the wings are sable".

 Artistic detail, not blazoned?
Adding wings is a CD.  For wings elevated, which I think is the
efault for wings on a non-winged thing, most but not all of the wing
hat you see is the underside.  That seems like way too much to call
n artistic detail.
Dannet de Lyncoln
- 
im McDaniel; Reply-To: tmcd at panix.com
______________________________________________
eralds mailing list
eralds at lists.ansteorra.org
ttp://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org