[ANSTHRLD] conflict check portcullis

[Vyolante Oporto]

Thanks for the Heads up - Hadn't seen that part of the site before.
That brought up a 112, I'll email again if I see something that gets close
that I havent listed.
Vy

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Marie de Blois <erminespot at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Vyolante Oporto <vyolante at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Again, same disclaimer, still finding my way around cadency. It would
> > probably help alot if you got anything for being chainless - in the oanda
> > chainless portcullis brought up no results.
>
> Nope, no difference for having chains or not.
>
> Also, if you are using the 'blazon pattern search' for doing conflict
> checking, I cannot urge you enough to not do so.  The Category Index
> is the best approach to take, because it will combine things which are
> considered the same for conflict (but blazoned differently) into a
> single category.  For example, Beast - Dog will include dogs, wolves,
> foxes, talbots, greyhounds, and all the other variant terms which I
> never remember all of (but it's quite a lot), whereas the blazon
> pattern search will only get 'dog' or 'wolf'.
>
> There are a few categories which blend things that do not conflict
> (say, Tools), but they're relatively rare.
>
>
> Marie
> _______________________________________________
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org
>