[ANSTHRLD] Other heraldic displays
ld_tadhg at yahoo.com
Mon Jul 23 09:46:24 PDT 2012
Ah, yes...I was vague.
Why? Don't know...group hasn't been made privy as to why.
I know three "why" conditions not met: donation, memorial, and vandalism.
I apologize for any disturbance. I was just trained from early on that the display of armory was reserved to the owner and that such a display implied the presence of the owner...and that the tent, flag, shield, etc., belonged to the owner.
Different question:Does anyone know of any group in Ansteorra with a tent decorated with armory other than that group's? If so, which group and what armory?
..whose showing his crotchety age today
--- On Mon, 7/23/12, Tim McDaniel <tmcd at panix.com> wrote:
> From: Tim McDaniel <tmcd at panix.com>
> Subject: Re: [ANSTHRLD] Other heraldic displays
> To: "Heralds List, Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCA, Inc." <heralds at lists.ansteorra.org>
> Date: Monday, July 23, 2012, 9:33 AM
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Tadhg <ld_tadhg at yahoo.com>
> > How about the reverse...displaying an individual's
> personal arms on
> > a baronial tent? And not as a collection of arms for
> the office.
> > With permission, it is legal. Would it be considered
> "I shot a man. Is it legal?" The answer is
> Is it a display outside or about the tent, or actually
> painted on or
> affixed to the tent? Why was it put there? I can
> imagine all sorts
> of possibilities: the arms of someone who donated the tent
> like the period practice of donating to a church and getting
> arms in it) to someone snuck in during the night and
> their arms on it.
> Danett Lincoln
> Tim McDaniel, tmcd at panix.com
> Heralds mailing list
> Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
More information about the Heralds