[ANSTHRLD] Website functionality

[Jacquie Ziegler]

On 5/30/2012 10:27 PM, Kathleen O'Brien wrote:
> On 5/30/2012 10:59 PM, Jacquie Ziegler wrote:
>> On 5/30/2012 9:56 PM, Kathleen O'Brien wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> This is what we ended up doing with the old LoIs and LoCs for the CoA.
>>> They are uploaded into OSCAR (well, as I progress through scanning the
>>> great heaping piles of LoIs and LoCs) and anyone with commenter access
>>> in OSCAR can read them. The reasoning behind that is that the original
>>> audience for these was the CoA mailing list, and that function is
>>> handled currently via OSCAR CoA level commenter rights.
>>>
>>> If we're interested, it may be worth checking with Istvan to see if
>>> the kingdom garden functionality could be applied to a file upload
>>> area for each kingdom - where commenters for the kingdom could access
>>> the uploaded files. Something to think about anyway. That would allow
>>> us to maintain one set of account permissions and the files would be
>>> included in the OSCAR backup.
>>>
>>> Mari
>>>
>>>
>> And if we are able to get that functionality, I can upload a LOT of
>> stuff to each Kingdom's area and get it out of my garage! :-D
>>
>> Shauna
>> Still Archiving
>
>
> How much of the stuff you're looking at archiving is kingdom CoH as 
> the audience versus Laurel Staff or CoA as the audience?  The current 
> functionality we have (that I'm working with) supports both CoA as the 
> audience and Laurel Staff as the audience.  So, we've got both of 
> those covered.  I ask because I don't really remember much (if any) of 
> the stuff in the Laurel files being kingdom CoH specific (from when it 
> lived in my garage).
>
> Mari
>
I'm looking at the drawers and drawers of Really Old LoIs and LoCs and 
also a lot of internal to the Kingdom paperwork that came up to Laurel 
level - old warrants, correspondence, that sort of thing. Not all of 
that should be in OSCAR, true, but the old LoIs and LoCs are certainly 
worth thinking about!

Shauna