[ANSTHRLD] Conflict Check: Or, on a pile gules a lion and a stag combatant counter-changed

[Tim McDaniel]

Robert of Coleford / Darnell Daniels <dmage121 at yahoo.com> asked about
> Or, on a pile gules a lion and a stag combatant counter-changed
...
> https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=3022563215756&set=a.1471610042896.59331.1612997228&type=3

The aminals are "overall", which the SCA uses to describe charges that
partially overlie a charge and partially overlie the field.  Also,
"counterchanged", no hyphen.

Or, a pile gules, overall a lion and a stag combatant counterchanged.

I honestly don't remember: do pile issue from the corners of the
shields?  There are proper pile placement precedents, but I don't have
convenient access to check them.

Has anyone seen this sort of arrangement in period armory?  I ask
because the client may care.  I get the impression that SENA is
not intended to be more strict on armory standards, but as written,
SENA can be interpreted as requiring documentation.

It will have to be conflict-checked two ways:
- field: Or.  primary charge: pile.  overall charges: beastie boys
- field: per chevron inverted.  primary charges: beastie boys.

Danyell de Linccolne
-- 
Tim McDaniel, tmcd at panix.com