[ANSTHRLD] Conflict Check: Or, on a pile gules a lion and a stag combatant counter-changed

[Bob Wade]

As in April, and as others have noted, this is not a pile.
 
"This is not a pile, because it issues from the top corners of the shield. Nor is it chaussé, because it does not extend all the way to base. Nor is it a chief triangular, because it is much too deep. Nor is it a per chevron inverted field division, because it does not issue from the sides of the field. As a result, this must be returned." (October 2001 LOAR, return of device for Rickard of Gwyntarian)

 
There's a nice article showing how each is drawn at http://rampart.outlandsheralds.org/lessons/blurring1.html

 
Note that "Or a pile gules and overall a lion and a stag combattant" has a conflict versus "Or, a pile gules" (Chandos [Important non-SCA arms], Device, Dec 1994). There's only 1 CD under the current rules for adding the overall charge group under RfS X.4c.


 
"Per chevron inverted gules and Or, a lion and a stag combattant" seemed clear When I checked last month.

 
 
Tostig



--- On Thu, 5/31/12, Darnell Daniels <dmage121 at yahoo.com> wrote:


From: Darnell Daniels <dmage121 at yahoo.com>
Subject: [ANSTHRLD] Conflict Check: Or, on a pile gules a lion and a stag combatant counter-changed
To: " Kingdom of Ansteorra - SCAInc. Heralds List" <heralds at lists.ansteorra.org>
Date: Thursday, May 31, 2012, 7:57 AM


Same device different wording.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=3022563215756&set=a.1471610042896.59331.1612997228&type=3

Robert of Coleford

_______________________________________________
Heralds mailing list
Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org