[ANSTHRLD] Conflict Check: Or, on a pile gules a lion and a stag combatant counter-changed

[Tim McDaniel]

On Thu, 31 May 2012, Darnell Daniels <dmage121 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> That is what I thought I will change to per chevron inverted and
> present to the client

"Per chevron" was not uncommon in period, but I don't ever remember
seeing "per chevron inverted" in period armory.  So would you mind
also mentioning "per chevron" to the client?  If they still require
something that's point downwards like this, well, that's that.  But
maybe they don't care so much and they'd be just as happy with a point
upwards.

Of course, conflicts may occur under one proposal or the other.

Danett de Lincoln
-- 
Tim McDaniel, tmcd at panix.com