[ANSTHRLD] Conflict Check: Or, on a pile gules a lion and a stag combatant counter-changed

[Tim McDaniel]

S L Niemann <slniemann at gmail.com> wrote:
> In this case the overall charges make this not able to be chaussee
> and I think that means you don't have to check against it. Do I
> remember that correctly? Mind is mush.

On Thu, 31 May 2012, Bob Wade <logiosophia at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Heraldicon?
> (i.e. Precedent forbids charges on the chauss{e'} side _now_)

No, I believe that Dum spiritus, spes has the right of it.
8/10 LoAR, Gwenllian of Emlyn,

     Since it is not registerable under that blazon, even though the
     old device is blazoned that way, we do not need to consider it for
     conflict under that blazon, by precedent:

and then quoting Cover Letter, June 2004.

Danyll de Linccolne
-- 
Tim McDaniel, tmcd at panix.com