[Northern] Northern Regional Warlord
cbackus at peakonline.com
Tue May 15 10:31:20 PDT 2001
On Mon, 14 May 2001 21:34:01 -0500
"Vortmax" <vortmax at mac.com> wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> If events happened the way you indicated, then nothing is
> wrong. However, the fact that the nobles of Namron,
> Wastelands, and Wiesenfuer were not consulted on the
> design on the war tabard indicates that events did not
> happen as you suggest.
Which nobles in the Wastelands need to be consulted? I
guess we have two, but are they the only ones who get to be
consulted? Just curious...
> If the North is to have a war tabard that is to be the
> symbol of an "unofficial Northern Army," I would think
> that the crown and all the Northern Nobles should be
> consulted on what is to be on the tabard. Then they and
> their charges can have input on the issue, thus making it
> a true representation of the North.
There is always going to be a disconnect between the way we
work in our feudal game and the way we are used to being
treated in our democratic "real world". I would like to put
in a voice that if this comes up, I don't want to have to go
through whichever nobility gets to claim my voice and maybe
just speak for myself. I can understand going through
nobility in say a barony, but I still think this is more an
issue that should go through the seneschalate.
> Lord Thomas of Weathershear
Don Stephen Hawkins of Eforde
More information about the Northern