[NR] [Namron] Regional Naming Meeting at Protectorate

Kirsten Pupek dnk_p at hotmail.com
Sun Oct 10 19:13:18 PDT 2010


As far as His Excellency and I are aware, there was no naming meeting held on Friday evening at Protectorate. Please correct us if we were misinformed.
YIS,
Baronessa Caterina




> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 11:52:24 -0500
> From: doug.copley at gmail.com
> To: northern at lists.ansteorra.org
> Subject: Re: [NR] [Namron] Regional Naming Meeting at Protectorate
> 
> There were a number of people that were there for the meeting that I 
> attended at Triumph of the Eclipse. I did not take a count but I would 
> guess that there were 50 to 60 people there. Some of those people took 
> the time and effort to drive to the event just for the meeting and then 
> left after wards. Of the people that were there, everyone that had 
> comments or suggestions were given the opportunity to speak and be heard 
> by all.
> 
> I do not know how may people were at the meeting last night since I was 
> unable to attend.
> 
> On the discussions on line, I do not see the problem with being able to 
> discuss it on line and make comments or suggestions. If you have 
> specific comments, thoughts, concerns, suggestions, or whatever ... I 
> would be delighted to hear them at this time. Please post them so we can 
> read them, have time to think about them, be able to respond to them, 
> and perhaps we can figure out answers and / or questions that others 
> have not thought of.
> 
> I will be waiting to hear some of your great ideas and thoughts on this 
> matter.
> 
> YIS,
> Vincenti
> 
> On 10/9/2010 11:29 AM, ksullivan6 at cox.net wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Doug Copley wrote:
> >
> >> hmmmm, not even close to what they said. There have been many posts
> > (about 224 over a 1 month period and 35 of those where not about name
> > suggestions or discussion)
> > on here about submitting names and making comments and a website created
> > just for that purpose.
> > ( 56 names on website, suggested by 14 people, last 1 added on 9/22)
> > Many people (60 out of over 500 paid members in the northern region, out
> > of those 60,10 people are responsible for ½ of the posts)
> > have been making posts and discussion here on line. They also stated
> > specifically that any group can get together at any time that they
> > choose to discuss pros and cons and names. What they stated was that at
> > this EARLY point in the discussions they do not want take away from the
> > an event that has been planned for months and scheduled and worked on to
> > just make changes and take people away for a discussion.
> > (Shouldn’t the people be allowed to make that decision for themselves?
> > Naming of this region deserves the time, and those who cannot make it on
> > fri nights also deserve to be heard in person, not just email )
> > the items in ( ) are mine. Just out of curiosity how many people have
> > attended the 2 meetings that have been held so far?
> > Misstress Alix Tiberga
> >>
> >> YIS, Vincenti
> >> On 10/8/2010 3:51 PM, ksullivan6 at cox.net wrote:
> >>> So, your Excellencys are saying that unless a person can make a
> >>> Friday evening meeting their opion does not count. If the naming of
> >>> the Northern region is important enough, then it should be important
> >>> enough to take time to talk about it in the Daylight hours on
> >>> Saturdays of events. If we are not willing enough to take part of our
> >>> Sat. for this then maybe we are not ready for this step. Mistress
> >>> Alix Tiberga
> >>>
> >>> Work hard,keep the ceremonies,live peaceably, and unite your hearts.
> >>> (Hopi)
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Daniel Pupek wrote:
> >>>> Her excellency and i see no problem with informal discussions of
> >>>> this sort. Since these meetings are informal and unofficial, evening
> >>>> meetings would be more appropriate. Daytime meetings would neglect
> >>>> the vast majority of those who attend our events to participate in
> >>>> daytime activities.
> >>>> No one person or group is spearheading this effort. Unfortunately,
> >>>> that sometimes means short notice. That also means you can hold your
> >>>> own discussions. What's important is that these discussions are open
> >>>> to everyone. Soon, everyone will coalesce around a few ideas and we
> >>>> can begin more formal discussions.
> >>>> So, please have discussions but let's keep in mind that they are
> >>>> still informal and should not interfere with the event. Also, we
> >>>> will not be able to attend since we have event obligations.
> >>>> HE Orlando
> >>>> On Friday, October 8, 2010, Jolene Graves <meraud90 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>>> I would like to take part in these meetings. Friday night at 10PM
> >>>>> is a very bad time for me. For one thing I will not be camping. For
> >>>>> another I have young children that need to be in bed at that time
> >>>>> and I have no time to arrange a baby sitter. Would it be possible
> >>>>> that a meeting be planned more than 3 days before an event? With
> >>>>> adequate notice I could arrange childcare if necessary. . I know
> >>>>> there are a lot of activities scheduled at every event, but if one
> >>>>> of these meetings could be help sometime on a Saturday we would
> >>>>> have greater participation in this process.
> >>>>> H.L. Meraud de Dun Carraig
> >>>>> Act well you part, there all the honour lays.
> >>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Northern mailing list
> Northern at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/northern-ansteorra.org
 		 	   		  


More information about the Northern mailing list