[NR] [Namron] Regional Naming Meeting at Protectorate

[Etienne de St. Amaranth]

I came out in case anyone did want to discuss the naming concept but no one at the covered pavilion was there to do that.  So at 11 I started my gate shift but there was no discussion.

Respectfully,
Sent from my iPhone,

Etienne

On Oct 10, 2010, at 9:13 PM, Kirsten Pupek <dnk_p at hotmail.com> wrote:

> 
> As far as His Excellency and I are aware, there was no naming meeting held on Friday evening at Protectorate. Please correct us if we were misinformed.
> YIS,
> Baronessa Caterina
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 11:52:24 -0500
>> From: doug.copley at gmail.com
>> To: northern at lists.ansteorra.org
>> Subject: Re: [NR] [Namron] Regional Naming Meeting at Protectorate
>> 
>> There were a number of people that were there for the meeting that I 
>> attended at Triumph of the Eclipse. I did not take a count but I would 
>> guess that there were 50 to 60 people there. Some of those people took 
>> the time and effort to drive to the event just for the meeting and then 
>> left after wards. Of the people that were there, everyone that had 
>> comments or suggestions were given the opportunity to speak and be heard 
>> by all.
>> 
>> I do not know how may people were at the meeting last night since I was 
>> unable to attend.
>> 
>> On the discussions on line, I do not see the problem with being able to 
>> discuss it on line and make comments or suggestions. If you have 
>> specific comments, thoughts, concerns, suggestions, or whatever ... I 
>> would be delighted to hear them at this time. Please post them so we can 
>> read them, have time to think about them, be able to respond to them, 
>> and perhaps we can figure out answers and / or questions that others 
>> have not thought of.
>> 
>> I will be waiting to hear some of your great ideas and thoughts on this 
>> matter.
>> 
>> YIS,
>> Vincenti
>> 
>> On 10/9/2010 11:29 AM, ksullivan6 at cox.net wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Doug Copley wrote:
>>> 
>>>> hmmmm, not even close to what they said. There have been many posts
>>> (about 224 over a 1 month period and 35 of those where not about name
>>> suggestions or discussion)
>>> on here about submitting names and making comments and a website created
>>> just for that purpose.
>>> ( 56 names on website, suggested by 14 people, last 1 added on 9/22)
>>> Many people (60 out of over 500 paid members in the northern region, out
>>> of those 60,10 people are responsible for ½ of the posts)
>>> have been making posts and discussion here on line. They also stated
>>> specifically that any group can get together at any time that they
>>> choose to discuss pros and cons and names. What they stated was that at
>>> this EARLY point in the discussions they do not want take away from the
>>> an event that has been planned for months and scheduled and worked on to
>>> just make changes and take people away for a discussion.
>>> (Shouldn’t the people be allowed to make that decision for themselves?
>>> Naming of this region deserves the time, and those who cannot make it on
>>> fri nights also deserve to be heard in person, not just email )
>>> the items in ( ) are mine. Just out of curiosity how many people have
>>> attended the 2 meetings that have been held so far?
>>> Misstress Alix Tiberga
>>>> 
>>>> YIS, Vincenti
>>>> On 10/8/2010 3:51 PM, ksullivan6 at cox.net wrote:
>>>>> So, your Excellencys are saying that unless a person can make a
>>>>> Friday evening meeting their opion does not count. If the naming of
>>>>> the Northern region is important enough, then it should be important
>>>>> enough to take time to talk about it in the Daylight hours on
>>>>> Saturdays of events. If we are not willing enough to take part of our
>>>>> Sat. for this then maybe we are not ready for this step. Mistress
>>>>> Alix Tiberga
>>>>> 
>>>>> Work hard,keep the ceremonies,live peaceably, and unite your hearts.
>>>>> (Hopi)
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Daniel Pupek wrote:
>>>>>> Her excellency and i see no problem with informal discussions of
>>>>>> this sort. Since these meetings are informal and unofficial, evening
>>>>>> meetings would be more appropriate. Daytime meetings would neglect
>>>>>> the vast majority of those who attend our events to participate in
>>>>>> daytime activities.
>>>>>> No one person or group is spearheading this effort. Unfortunately,
>>>>>> that sometimes means short notice. That also means you can hold your
>>>>>> own discussions. What's important is that these discussions are open
>>>>>> to everyone. Soon, everyone will coalesce around a few ideas and we
>>>>>> can begin more formal discussions.
>>>>>> So, please have discussions but let's keep in mind that they are
>>>>>> still informal and should not interfere with the event. Also, we
>>>>>> will not be able to attend since we have event obligations.
>>>>>> HE Orlando
>>>>>> On Friday, October 8, 2010, Jolene Graves <meraud90 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> I would like to take part in these meetings. Friday night at 10PM
>>>>>>> is a very bad time for me. For one thing I will not be camping. For
>>>>>>> another I have young children that need to be in bed at that time
>>>>>>> and I have no time to arrange a baby sitter. Would it be possible
>>>>>>> that a meeting be planned more than 3 days before an event? With
>>>>>>> adequate notice I could arrange childcare if necessary. . I know
>>>>>>> there are a lot of activities scheduled at every event, but if one
>>>>>>> of these meetings could be help sometime on a Saturday we would
>>>>>>> have greater participation in this process.
>>>>>>> H.L. Meraud de Dun Carraig
>>>>>>> Act well you part, there all the honour lays.
>>>>>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Northern mailing list
>> Northern at lists.ansteorra.org
>> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/northern-ansteorra.org
>                         
> _______________________________________________
> Northern mailing list
> Northern at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/northern-ansteorra.org