[Northkeep] principality

[marc-carlson at utulsa.edu]

>From: "Susan Pettey" <susanpettey at msn.com>
>That is where I was confused.  If this had been formal then, if I understand
>correctly what I read in Corpora, only paid members would have counted and
>it would have been a majority of paid members not just a majority of those
>that voted.  So in effect those who do not vote are presumed to have voted
>no, whether that presumption is correct or incorrect.  The majority of paid
>members must vote yes for the Kingdom Seneschal to even consider a petition
>for Principality status.
>
>Am I understanding this correctly, Marc?

I believe so.  Had this been a formal thing, then only the paid members would
have counted - of course that would have only been a 152 out of 343 (or 44%,
of whom an unknown number said "yes").

Marc/Diarmaid