[Northkeep] [NR] The Northkeep/Thorgrim and Sigen Issue
celticrufus at hotmail.com
Tue May 22 06:53:26 PDT 2001
to whom it may concern,
this letter was not a statement of political opinion, i have only been
playing for six monthes and have no interest at all in becoming involved
with the politics of the sca. i was only trying to clear up the confusion
of Chass. sorry if i offended anyone. i must admit that i did not realize
that my response would be posted to the list. i have no opinion either way
on the troubles that have been brewing on the northern regional list and
desire only to stay out of the argument. thank you for taking the time to
>From: "Elizabeth Kelley" <celticrufus at hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: northkeep at ansteorra.org
>To: northkeep at ansteorra.org
>Subject: Re: [Northkeep] [NR] The Northkeep/Thorgrim and Sigen Issue
>Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 17:45:52 -0500
>someone spoke out against the descision to ask sigen and thorgim to step
>down and they did it in a less than mature way by speaking of barn's police
>record and saying that he isn't perfect either, yet he hasn't been asked to
>step down. (of course my description is fairly kind in comparison to the
>>From: Brown Chass <dwarvenhome at yahoo.com>
>>Reply-To: northkeep at ansteorra.org
>>To: northkeep at ansteorra.org
>>Subject: Re: [Northkeep] [NR] The Northkeep/Thorgrim and Sigen Issue
>>Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 15:29:55 -0700 (PDT)
>>Umm I didnt get that email... so i dont knwo what was
>>said etc... are they filtering this ???
>>--- Marc Carlson <marc-carlson at utulsa.edu> wrote:
>> > At 08:41 AM 5/21/01 -0700, Michael wrote:
>> > >>no one from here has made any slanderous or liable
>> > comments.
>> > >>seditious is in the eye of the beholder.
>> > >seditious is allowing liars to sit as landeds,
>> > seditious is what the crown
>> > >>did to our landeds, some idiot from the peanut
>> > gallery screeching out the
>> > >>'truth' is not seditious...
>> > Since it's the eye of the beholder, it may well be.
>> > I'm not taking a stand here --
>> > I don't approve of how Michael chose to express
>> > himself, but then my approval
>> > isn't necessary. On the other hand, publicly
>> > presenting an ugly "Fact" in a form
>> > that serves only to encourage the recent
>> > factionalism (whether that is needed
>> > not) is no more or less seditious than the
>> > suggestion that people redefine
>> > "stuff" to include dog excrement.
>>Get a taste for religion... Lick a witch.
>>ICQ # 2776047
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
>>Northkeep mailing list
>>Northkeep at ansteorra.org
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>Northkeep mailing list
>Northkeep at ansteorra.org
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
More information about the Northkeep