[Ravensfort] land committee voting

byzytym byzytym at att.net
Wed Feb 3 13:44:51 PST 2010


That should have been,
It could skew the vote away from the best choice.

V NV

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "byzytym" <byzytym at att.net>
To: <lococnc at consolidated.net>; "Gary Pace" <ridgetopfarm at me.com>; "Ravens 
Fort" <ravensfort at lists.ansteorra.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Ravensfort] land committee voting


>I will generally lean toward the "KISS" system.
> If ya keep it "simple" things run somewhat smoother.
> You just don't see people or groups
> nominating candidates they don't believe in.
> They select only one and back the choice.
> What's the point of putting up a weak candidate ?
> I could skew the vote away from the best choice.
>
> V NV
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mike Gamber" <lococnc at consolidated.net>
> To: "byzytym" <byzytym at att.net>; "Gary Pace" <ridgetopfarm at me.com>; 
> "Ravens Fort" <ravensfort at lists.ansteorra.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 10:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ravensfort] land committee voting
>
>
>> Then take the top 3 of everyones lists of 5... You can't just take the 
>> top 1 from each of the land committee members, it skews the other 
>> choices. I could write a long diatribe on how this works, but trust me, 
>> you want to do it this way:
>>
>> Top 5 choices from 5 people gives you 5 viable options to present to the 
>> populace who votes for one (1) choice. They should also be presented in 
>> the order they received the most votes by the original 5.
>>
>> ---- Original message ----
>>>Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 20:05:54 -0600
>>>From: "byzytym" <byzytym at att.net>
>>>Subject: Re: [Ravensfort] land committee voting
>>>To: "Gary Pace" <ridgetopfarm at me.com>, "Ravens Fort" 
>>><ravensfort at lists.ansteorra.org>
>>>
>>>I don't understand why we need to give 5 choices.
>>>If you take everyone's top nomination only,
>>>you will still have a good list to choose from.
>>>If you don't get 5 different nominations,
>>>that means that there are not 5 strong choices.
>>>The idea is for us to narrow things down.
>>>Just my two cents.
>>>
>>>V NV
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message ----- 
>>>From: "Gary Pace" <ridgetopfarm at me.com>
>>>To: "Ravens Fort" <ravensfort at lists.ansteorra.org>
>>>Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 9:19 AM
>>>Subject: [Ravensfort] land committee voting
>>>
>>>
>>>> Okay everyone on the land committee- that is-
>>>> Brian and Fionna-
>>>> Mike Gamber- has voted
>>>> Gundy-
>>>> VNV-has voted
>>>> Seneschal-has voted
>>>>
>>>>    I do not have the email addys of everyone but I really need the land
>>>> comm. to send me their 5 selections in order of preference so I can 
>>>> tally
>>>> and have the final 5 ready for Populace this Thursday evening. If you 
>>>> want
>>>> input and are on the land comm. and haven't voted, I need it asap. YIS, 
>>>> G
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ravensfort mailing list
>>>> Ravensfort at lists.ansteorra.org
>>>> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ravensfort-ansteorra.org
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Ravensfort mailing list
>>>Ravensfort at lists.ansteorra.org
>>>http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ravensfort-ansteorra.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ravensfort mailing list
> Ravensfort at lists.ansteorra.org
> http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/ravensfort-ansteorra.org 




More information about the Ravensfort mailing list