SC - RE: Comment to "limit" responses WAS: I CHALLENGE YOU...
Laura C. Minnick
lcm at efn.org
Thu Apr 6 04:53:15 PDT 2000
RichSCA at aol.com wrote:
>
> I guess the Subject Line could have read "I challenge you to limit responses.
> :-)
>
> But WOW... I know that the missive was not directed to me, but I just have to
> comment. No, I do not work, or leave the computer (except to walk the dogs).
> - stuck here in the RV. And I do sleep (now and then). Have we a limited
> number of replies that we should be sticking to? If I have exceeded mine,
> forgive me. I do post directly to people off-line for a number of comments
> and will try to watch the bandwith better.
>
> Rayne
No Rayne, the comment was not directed at you, and I meant no offense. I
spend a great deal of time on the computer also, and sometimes I have to
force myself to get up and do something else. :-) I've never seen or
heard of a limit on this list, though I am on other lists which limit to
three posts of a certain number of screens- because of prolific writers
and the fact that somepeople have measured service. Normally it doesn't
bother me when someone gets on a tear. But the past couple of days close
to half of the posts have come from one address. Could that be just an
eensy bit excessive? I was trying to gently say so. Perhaps I missed my
mark.
'Lainie
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list