SC - Re: Dream kitchen

[CBlackwill@aol.com]

In a message dated 6/13/00 5:30:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time, troy at asan.com 
writes:

> What we seem to tend to do is more like Feast Highlights, Film at 11.
>  Not that we couldn't make a better attempt at a real period feast and
>  menu structure, but we'd probably have to build an event around it,
>  rather than simply providing a fancy meal for people at one of our events.
>       

So why not replace the "Breakfast", "Lunch" and "Feast" monickers at events 
with "First Remove", "Second Remove", etc...?  This way, the populace still 
gets thier flirting and rear-smooching time between "courses", and the Feast 
Steward still gets to provide a "complete feast".

I've never been a fan of the "dine and dash" method of eating.  Particularly 
when I have paid good money to go to a "feast".  I like a long, leisurley 
meal, with plenty of entertainment and good conversation in between courses.  
Sure, a break or two for smokes behind the woodshed, or begging your way into 
a Pelican is always appreciated, but, particularly if the event is a "feast 
event", the meal should take precedence.  

Balthazar of Blackmoor
(just my two penne worth)

Mr. Wizard, what happens when you combine pasta and antipasta?