SC - Historical varieties

Wed Apr 4 12:42:39 PDT 2001

- --part1_50.13be3068.27fcc285_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 4/4/01 11:17:45 AM US Mountain Standard Time, 
upsxdls_osu at ionet.net writes:

> Just said I read it "somewhere." Don't necessarily agree. Liadan
> 
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:04:16 EDT you wrote:
> 
> > Really? I've always made chili using both beef and pork together. And I 
> have 
> > several Cajun receipes that do the same. 
> > 
> 

Oh, I wasn't arguing or anything. I don't doubt that somewhere there is a 
statement like that. I just wonder, besides the sweet, what they base that 
on, and when it changed...or if it was always a cultural thing. I know 
Spanish cooking uses it, and Cajun....so I wonder if it was a *type* of 
cooking  culturally that felt that it was inappropriate. Sorta like the whole 
*tomato* issue in period. I remember when it was discussed before one of the 
reasons quoted was that the leaves, basically everything but the fruit, is 
poison, and therefore, it was considered posion too. That changed much, much 
later. So, it makes me wonder when about the thing of combining pork with 
other meats changed? Does it go back to the Judaic laws, the Muslim laws?

Just one of those mid morning wondering aloud things.....

Lars

- --part1_50.13be3068.27fcc285_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><BODY BGCOLOR="#ff80c0">In a message dated 4/4/01 11:17:45 AM US Mountain Standard Time, 
 upsxdls_osu at ionet.net writes:
 
 
 <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Just said I read it "somewhere." Don't necessarily agree. Liadan
 
 On Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:04:16 EDT you wrote:
 
 > Really? I've always made chili using both beef and pork together. And I 
 have 
 > several Cajun receipes that do the same. 
 > 
 </BLOCKQUOTE>
 
 Oh, I wasn't arguing or anything. I don't doubt that somewhere there is a 
 statement like that. I just wonder, besides the sweet, what they base that 
 on, and when it changed...or if it was always a cultural thing. I know 
 Spanish cooking uses it, and Cajun....so I wonder if it was a *type* of 
 cooking  culturally that felt that it was inappropriate. Sorta like the whole 
 *tomato* issue in period. I remember when it was discussed before one of the 
 reasons quoted was that the leaves, basically everything but the fruit, is 
 poison, and therefore, it was considered posion too. That changed much, much 
 later. So, it makes me wonder when about the thing of combining pork with 
 other meats changed? Does it go back to the Judaic laws, the Muslim laws?
 
 Just one of those mid morning wondering aloud things.....
 
 Lars</HTML>

- --part1_50.13be3068.27fcc285_boundary--