[Sca-cooks] Fw: Response to Crusades and cannibalism

[Kirsten Houseknecht]

there is also ancestor eating.. in which you are trying to keep the magic of
your family.. in the family!
and to tie it back into other topics... it is one primary reason for the
spread of the human varient of mad cow disease.. it was transmitted by
cannibilism in some cultures.  this is why when the disease started showing
up in people in England it was a bit *shocking* as i believe it was
previously mostly found in New Guinea????
Kirsten
kirsten at fabricdragon.com
http://www.fabricdragon.com

"Did you vote?  No?   Then don't come whining to me...."
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laura C. Minnick" <lcm at efn.org>
To: <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Fw: Response to Crusades and cannibalism


> At 10:38 AM 12/12/02 -0800, you wrote:
> >
> >Years a good I read and enjoyed _The Man-Eating Myth_. At that point,
> >judging by the book, the orthodoxy among anthropologists was that
> >(non-starvation) cannibalism did exist or had existed in a wide
> >variety of cultures. The book was an attempt to debunk that belief,
> >and argued that there was no good evidence for it anywhere.
>
> Yeah- I remember reading a review of it in... nuts. Can't remember the
name
> of the journal. It's in a box 180 miles from here... Lit Crit rag, IIRC.
>
> >I thought the author probably overstated his claim, since there was
> >one substantial body of evidence (Fiji, I think--somewhere in the
> >Pacific) that he mentioned but made no serious effort to explain
> >away. But he persuasively argued that most reports of cannibalism
> >were evidence of the credulity of anthropologists (and others). I
> >didn't realize that his position was now accepted by many, and a
> >center of controversy, as Paul seems to be implying.
>
> Well, as I mentioned before, the basic line of thought in the dept when I
> was there was that it was basically a topos- you accuse your enemy of the
> atrocities you are most afraid of, which most disgust you, or conversely,
> are the most secret, ugly urges that you have yourself.
>
> The Pacific Islander accounts of cannibalism are in a very different vein-
> they are highly ritualized, specific acts (of only specific parts, I might
> add), mostly having to do with ingesting the qualities of the person being
> eaten, be it bravery, loyalty, or garlic. ;-) It is also the most
> humiliating thing you can do to an enemy (and therein is the resemblance
to
> Hannibal Lecter- the desire to demonstrate power and control).
>
> Those are specific cases however, of which have little bearing on the
> alleged acts of cannibalism by crusaders. Eating someone becasue you're
> starving and eating someone's heart or liver or such to gain his bravery
is
> very different. I think we do either a disservice by lumping them
together.
>
> 'Lainie
> -was hungry, now I'm not so sure...
>
____________________________________________________________________________
> Sometimes Life makes drastic changes without our permission...
> _______________________________________________
> Sca-cooks mailing list
> Sca-cooks at ansteorra.org
> http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/sca-cooks
>