[Sca-cooks] Re: Debatable Crown

[Carol Eskesen Smith]

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
It is my recollection the we knew almost instantly about the problem (I vabguely recall toasting our new Prince and Princess at a Brew U the day he won, and us all knowing the following day that he did not have a valid membership and so had removed himself from consideration). A second Crown was rescheduled for a couple of weeks later, and Lucan was not permitted to enter it - that time around, as he was the one who had caused the problems, however inadvertently.  I forget who won that one, but it was a summer crown before he first won while holding valid membership.
Regards,
Brekke

----- Original Message -----
From: Bronwynmgn at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 8:23 AM
To: sca-cooks at ansteorra.org
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] Re: Debatable Crown

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
In a message dated 12/31/2002 7:11:54 PM Eastern Standard Time,
StefanliRous at austin.rr.com writes:


> Did he then turn around and declare this? If so, then I think you have to
> give him credit for doing so. It might or might not have been discovered
> later. Crown tournaments often seem to be the anti-thesis of what the SCA
> is supposedly based upon.

Oh yes, he did.  I forget whether they refought the whole tourney or just
gave it to the other finalist, though...I wasn't thinking much about royalty
in those days :-)

>
>
> Which Kingdom is Lucan from/in?

East.

Brangwayna
_______________________________________________
Sca-cooks mailing list
Sca-cooks at ansteorra.org
http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/sca-cooksGet more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com