[Sca-cooks] Getting the most use out of a particular food
Phil Troy/ G. Tacitus Adamantius
adamantius at verizon.net
Sat Jul 19 09:22:12 PDT 2003
Also sprach Diana Skaggs:
>I have a question for the group. Last night I was shopping. I found
>a lovely 5# bottom round roast for $2.18 per pound. My SO said
>"lookie here, a brisket, way bigger, for the same price." I tried
>to explain to him, by the time I carved all the fat off the brisket,
>I wouldn't have any more usable meat than on the roast. Is there any
>other reasons anyone can think of?
Using that particular example with those two particular cuts, I can't
think of another reason, although that reason is a pretty good one.
If the large, fatty cut were the same price but something that can be
cooked with dry heat (say, a rib roast, not that that's likely to
happen), instead of by braising or steaming (and even pit barbecuing
amounts to a form of steaming), I'd think shrinkage might be an
issue. A rareish roast cut of equivalent raw weight would presumably
shrink less than a braised pot roast, not so much because of the cut,
but because the braising cut pretty much needs to be well-done, or
nearly so, to be palatable. But between two moist-heat cuts of the
same weight, waste does need to be considered.
A shame, though. I much prefer brisket myself.
Was the brisket the same price per pound, or larger and cheaper,
netting the same total cost?
Adamantius (checking freezer)
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list