[Sca-cooks] originals and redactions,
johnna holloway
johnna at sitka.engin.umich.edu
Tue Sep 2 08:11:23 PDT 2003
> Nancy Kiel wrote:>
>> In regards to an author's redactions without the original receipt, yes
>> it is
>> possible to locate the original using the footnotes etc. But who has the
>> time? I'll take an original over a redaction anytime, no matter how
>> competent the redactor is.
But if one already has the originals (and I do have all of the 16th
texts that are available at hand and within reach) what one wants for
classes and for reference purposes are lots of examples of redactions to
show people. I have taught classes on historical culinary sources for
audiences for over 25 years. What I want to be able to present to an
audience is the full range of sources that are out there today. As to
why one ought to spend the time to back to the originals, well that's
part of research aspect to this field. It's much easier today to find
these recipes. For someone just getting started, findind a recipe they
like first in a modern version may lead them back to the original text
and into more recipes that are of the same type. {By the way Brears'
recipes in All the King's Cooks are drawn largely from his earlier works
which do have the original recipes presented. If you own all his works,
you will actually already own the majority of the originals that he
uses. And if you don't own them, then the footnotes present a shopping
list of things to look out for in terms of acquisitions.]
> In regards to judging documentation/redactions, why does the entrant need
>> to include his/her process? Isn't the receipt itself the process?
Actually one often encounters entries for dishes that are labeled very
clearly as something like "Stewed Pears". The entry itself then states
that it was baked and seemed to be comprised of cored, peeled, and
quartered pears (canned comes to mind).
A judge in that case has to question why the baking and where in the
process did the entrant peel, core and quarter the pears. What's left
unsaid in these recipe entries raises all sorts of questions that need
to be addressed. According to the criteria that one is required to judge
by, the judge has to question why the original recipe was changed and
why didn't the entrant talk about those changes in their write-up.
Johnnae llyn Lewis
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list