[Sca-cooks] Re: OT- KIlts at war
Stefan li Rous
StefanliRous at austin.rr.com
Sun Sep 19 21:11:12 PDT 2004
Cassie replied to Wistan with:
> I have been told by a scottsman who recieved his kilt from his
> grandfather that depending on what shoulder you drapped the end
> indicated your marital status. I just don"t remember which shoulder is
> which though.
Oh? I don't remember hearing that before. In period, it does seem to be
common that unmarried women wore their hair uncovered, while those who
were married wore it covered.
> And I Can't assume it would correlate with the modern
> wedding band side for the German wear their rings on the right hand.
Wedding traditions can be tricky. Many traditions are post-medieval and
many modern ones date from just Victorian times. Check the WEDDINGS
section of the Florilegium for more details.
> I have also been told a mans kilt is to be twice as long as he is tall
> for it will also serve as his shroud in death.Somewhere I have an
> article or two on the subject`
I'd be interested in hearing more about this. What I've heard more was
that it was just a very convenient length for a poor people because it
could serve many uses. Not having to be cut and sewn it was very
economical
> My husband and three year old look fabulous in theirs so I am
> allways
> eager to hear peoples opinions on kilts.
You can find a fair amount of material on the kilt in these Florilegium
files in the CLOTHING section:
cl-Scot-male-art (18K) 6/20/96 Scottish men's clothing.
cl-Scotland-msg (114K) 10/31/01 Clothing of Scotland. folding of
kilts.
One of the things that surprised me was how short the time frame that
the traditional kilt was actually worn was (I think ~ 150 years) for
all the hubbub it causes today. I suspect a lot of it is nostalgia and
a wish for the "good old days" and probably a bit of rebellion, at
least a century ago. And because it is different.
>
> Brett McNamara <brettmc at gmail.com> wrote:
> You sure that wasn't a girl scout? ;)
>
> It's probably worth mentioning that the kilt we see today, the one
> most often seen on Catholic school girls, is quite OOP. The best
> evidence for the period version has it looking suspiciously like plaid
> togas. I believe the modern variant may have been part of some
> British conspiracy.
>
> Wistan
Considering the lengths the British or I guess more precisely, the
English, went to to suppress the kilt, I seriously doubt the short
variant was a Britsh conspiracy.
Stefan
--------
THLord Stefan li Rous Barony of Bryn Gwlad Kingdom of Ansteorra
Mark S. Harris Austin, Texas
StefanliRous at austin.rr.com
**** See Stefan's Florilegium files at: http://www.florilegium.org ****
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list