[Sca-cooks] RE: Cannibalism , ritualistic or otherwise

[el2iot2 at mail.com]

That is not what I said.  you want to spend months going over this on-line when we can speak inperson and have a greater understanding of all aspect?  E-mail is limited in its usefullness in complex communication.  Face to Face debate are far more informative allowing for the full force of the complexity of inter-personal communications, much is said with body language and tone/inflection and can not be readily express in a restrictive envirment such as this.

I am willing to talk.  I am willing to stae my case, but this is not the proper place for that.

joy
Radei
----- Original Message -----
From: "Laura C. Minnick" <lcm at jeffnet.org>
To: "Cooks within the SCA" <sca-cooks at ansteorra.org>
Subject: Re: [Sca-cooks] RE: Cannibalism , ritualistic or otherwise
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:21:59 -0700

> 
> At 01:07 PM 4/22/2005, you wrote:
> > I know it is controversial, but I suppost my position. I have 
> > studied extensively on the topic, and am ordained clergy.
> >
> > so, if you disagree or even if you agree, I will debate religious 
> > doctrine with anyone who so wishes.  But not here. Personal 
> > conversation, off=line is always welcome.
> 
> So provocative blanket statements are ok, but discussion with 
> rational, supported argument is not?
> 
> How curious.
> 
> 'Lainie
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> O it is excellent to have a giant's strength; but it is tyrannous 
> To use it like a giant--Shakespeare, Measure for Measure, Act II  
> _______________________________________________
> Sca-cooks mailing list
> Sca-cooks at ansteorra.org
> http://www.ansteorra.org/mailman/listinfo/sca-cooks



joy

-- 
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm