[Sca-cooks] on topic: Healthy Feasts - was OT: diet, was sugar problems
Tom.Vincent at yahoo.com
Sat Aug 5 09:58:42 PDT 2006
There are often exceptions, of course, but the weight-loss rule for 90+%
of folks is four words: Eat less, move more.
The psychological challenges of combating appetite signals are very
difficult. If overweight people can 'trick' themselves into feeling
full on fewer calories (with lo/no cal appetizers, for example) and eat
foods with lower caloric densities (soups, veggies, and so on), that can
help a lot.
It isn't really eating less food, it's eating less calories. Complex
carbohydrates (whole grains, veggies, beans, etc.) don't spike blood
sugar and are digested more slowly.
It's a complex problem, that's for sure. If it were easier, we wouldn't
be ballooning into oblivion.
In the SCA, are any cooks/chefs/feastocrats consciously (or
conscientiously) adjusting feast menus to cut back on the fats and
increase the use of healthier ingredients? I'm often horrified at the
amount of cheeses, meats, butter & oil that goes into so many of the
dishes I see (or help) prepare at feasts. The only way I can justify
partaking in the feasts is by working a few pounds off in the kitchen
beforehand and being a server during. :)
Kirsten Houseknecht wrote:
> most of the obese people i know are active (no, not my husband) a few of
> them are VERY active.. however.....
> i know people who count every calorie, know *exactly* what went into their
> mouth, and do not lose an ounce.
> their metabolism will not let go without a fight.
> change WHAT they are eating, even with the same calories, and they lose
> weight. because it changes how their body is processing food.
> for other people changing what they eat will change their appetite, making
> it possible for them to eat less food.
> eat foods that spike your blood sugar, (high glycemic) and you will gain
> weight as opposed to the same calories that are low glycemic. (more
> applicable for diabetics and people with sugar problems)
> certain fats seem to convince your metabolism (or at least some people's
> metabolism) that it can relax, the famine is over, and start losing the fat
> stores. others seem to "store" more, or whatever.. but for many overweight
> people dropping all trans fats and hydrogenated fats from their diet, and
> replacing them with mono unsaturateds and etc seems to make a big difference
> in their metabolism.
> and then there are foods that induce cravings. that lead you to increase
> your caloric intake. verses foods that fill you up for less calories, or
> cause you to lose your appetite.
> most *liquid* foods seem to fill you up. but many of them are loaded with
> calories and contain appetite triggers like artificial sweeteners. soup, on
> the other hand, is a good thing.
> Kirsten Houseknecht
> Fabric Dragon
> kirsten at fabricdragon.com
> Philadelphia, PA USA
> Trims, Amber, Jet, Jewelry, and more...
> Before you leave the house: hat, water, medication if needed
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Let's be serious here: For the very rare 'obese person that is very
>> physically active' to exist, they're still consuming many more calories
>> than they burn. Burning 5,000 calories while consuming 7,500 calories
>> in a day doesn't help lose weight. Doesn't have anything to do with
> Sca-cooks mailing list
> Sca-cooks at lists.ansteorra.org
"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and
carrying the cross" - Sinclair Lewis
More information about the Sca-cooks