[Sca-cooks] Word usage was Re: remove vs course
Terry Decker
t.d.decker at worldnet.att.net
Tue Jun 6 20:17:59 PDT 2006
In the case of the Apocrypha, the Catholic Church holds it to be erroneous
and therefore apocryphal. Certain gnostic sects hold it to be true. So I
would say in that case there is some question about the question of whether
its true. Depending on your beliefs, the Apocrypha may be apocryphal,
probably apocryphal, probably not apocryphal, or God-given truth.
Redundancy must be gauged in context. But I think you're (probably) correct
about the redundancy.
Bear
> It may be the mysterious Catholic thing at work, but it should be
> pretty easy to determine if something is, or is not, in the
> Apocrypha. <clipped>
>
> When we say it's probably apocryphal, what most people seem to tend
> to mean is that it is perhaps untrue, or is of dubious authenticity,
> but from a diction point of view, what it actually does mean is more
> like, there's some question about the question of whether it's true.
>
> Generally speaking, it tends to be redundant in practical usage.
>
> Adamantius
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list