[Sca-cooks] Offboard/Onboard/court bored? (was RE: Vegetarian & Vegans was Re: lethal drinks)
ladyadele at paradise.net.nz
Mon Aug 11 15:01:13 PDT 2008
>Not disagreeing with either of your comments. Would have "infrequent" been
>better than "rare" in my response? Again, from an exchequer point of view,
>breaking out the fee structure is also helpful in an event bid. Thus,
>unless you plan an all inclusive fee structure particular to the event
>(i.e. all day side board), it makes the numbers easier to manage.
I have no idea whether "rare" or "infrequent" is a better word. I only
know about the events organised by my local group and one or two others.
From an Exchequer/Reeve standpoint, any income estimate in a bid should
be derived from the estimated attendees and the fee structure-- so
essentially, there should be an estimate of the number paying X each fee
and each of those numbers should appear as a line item under income.
That's just basic information that should appear in an event budget.
That's quite different from financial reporting, though.
>many people don't want to have to pay for food that they may not be able to
>eat. A broken down fee structure allows individuals (for personal reasons)
>to enjoy part of an event as best suited their needs.
Quite likely. But that's not the event Steward's problem, not a
financial planning or reporting issue.
Antonia di Benedetto Calvo
Habeo metrum - musicamque,
hominem meam. Expectat alium quid?
More information about the Sca-cooks