[Sca-cooks] A question sure to cause controversy
Phil Troy / G. Tacitus Adamantius
adamantius1 at verizon.net
Thu Feb 19 08:16:59 PST 2009
On Feb 19, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Susan Lin wrote:
> Do people prefer Chef de Cuisine (or some version thereof) or is
> Feast-o-crat okay? I know people who absolutely despise F-O-C and
> can be
> verbally violent about it. I came from the East where it seemed to be
> routinely used but now in the Outlands I've had to watch what I say.
I remember that term becoming popular in the mid-to-late 80's in the
East (I remember a lady from Meridies referring to me by that term,
and I didn't really know at the time what it meant), and I live in the
group that, at one time, _was_ the East.
Yes, you still occasionally hear the term, but I think a lot of people
are trying to avoid it (also autocrat), since there are several terms
that can be used which not only describe the role more accurately, but
also in a manner more consistent with the goals of a group attempting
to portray history.
It needlessly removes the person you're describing from a role in
period society, and that is somewhat akin to standing in the lists at
a Crown Tourney and loudly calling the finalists stick-jocks, or
fencers wire-weenies. Yes, one could argue it's an accurate
description [one could also argue to the contrary]; it's just not as
good a description as we're capable of using.
Adamantius
"Most men worry about their own bellies, and other people's souls,
when we all ought to worry about our own souls, and other people's
bellies."
-- Rabbi Israel Salanter
More information about the Sca-cooks
mailing list