[Sca-cooks] Downsizing Sugar??

Johnna Holloway johnnae at mac.com
Wed Nov 28 14:49:48 PST 2012


Yeah, I found it amusing too.

There are all sorts of people who complained because the 4 pound bag doesn't fill their 5 pound sugar jar.

Johnnae

On Nov 28, 2012, at 5:36 PM, Terry Decker wrote:

> How humorous.  To save our profits, we're going to cut the amount in the package and raise our prices.  And of course, not one word about us paying twice the global retail rate already.  There is price support legislation in the Farm Bill that limits the amount of imported sugar forcing prices to about double the world market rate.  Great for sugar companies, lousy for companies and people who use sugar.  There is a study from Iowa State that says eliminating the subsidies would save sugar consumers $3.5 billion per year and create 20,000 new jobs in the food industry.  The counter argument is ending the price supports would destabilize the domestic sugar industry and probably close a number of refineries, particularly damaging the sugar beet industry, as these tend to be local co-ops.
> 
> It's been quite a while since the pound of coffee became 11 ounces, so I guess the 80% downsizing of a bag of sugar is probably here to stay.
> 
> Bear
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> snipped
> Explained: C&H Sugar’s 5-to-4 lb. bags Reduction
> 
> by C&H Sugar on Friday, February 18, 2011 at 2:49pm ·
> As many of our fans have noticed, the price of sugar has recently increased. In an effort to alleviate some of the confusion and frustration about this change we wanted to formally address it here.
> 
> As you may be aware, the price of sugar on the world market has nearly doubled since the end of 2008.  [You can see the data here at the USDA site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/sugar/Data/Table04.xls ]. In order to offset our cost increases, we have had to raise our price per pound of sugar.
> In order to keep the cost per bag of sugar down, many retailers converted their store brand product from a 5-pound to a 4-pound bag. In an effort to maintain affordability we decided to do the same with our C&H® brand sugar. The reduction in size, however, is not enough to offset the cost increase in the remaining four pounds of the product. That’s why you’re seeing the price go up and the size go down at the same time. We understand the frustration and we assure you we are doing everything we can to maintain the value and affordability that our consumers expect from our brand. We hope that this has helped alleviate some of the confusion around this recent change.
> 
> We appreciate your loyalty to C&H products. Thank you for your continued support!”
> 




More information about the Sca-cooks mailing list