SR - principality

[maddie teller-kook]

A few points:
1.  I do not think an entire kingdom would be turned into principalities.  A
viable group would be left to carry on with the kingdoms name, etc.  As far as I
know, I don't think this has ever happened.  Tho some kingdoms are a former
shadow of themselves (ie Atenveldt).

2.  I would hope the BOD would listen to ALL groups and only form a principality
with the groups that all agree.  Bringing in a group that is against the entire
process will set up bad feelings between members of the group.  Not a good way
to start and not something I would like to see happen here in Ansteorra.

Meadhbh

Raymond Catz wrote:

> To those of you that have replied in the negative to the proposition that a
> shire can be forced against its will into a principality:
>
> Technically, I think you are probably correct. However, as a practical
> matter, it can happen.
>
> Let's assume that Seawinds decides to go with the southern principality and
> La Marche does not.  The reality is that La Marche will be cut off in a
> small Ansteorran enclave without any option to go with any principality
> which may thereafter be formed.  (Although I suppose that it is possible
> that we could be jerrymandered into a western principality).
>
> Lets further assume that other principalities form until virtually the
> entire kingdom is involved. La Marche will be left with a hobson's choice
> between remaining in an isolated enclave, or going with the southern
> principality.
>
>                                                 Jeremy
> ============================================================================
> Go to http://www.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.



============================================================================
Go to http://www.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.