SR - principality

[Raymond Catz]

You may have something there.  The real issue is that La Marche seems to
feel a closer kinship with Stargate that to the baronies of the southern
region.  It's noboby's fault, that's just how it worked out.

I would not like to see a situation in which La Marche was unable to join
in a principality of its choice (assuming the Stargate ever wanted to do
this), because of a border problem.

				Jeremy 

----------
> From: maddie teller-kook <meadhbh at io.com>
> To: southern at Ansteorra.ORG
> Subject: Re: SR - principality
> Date: Tuesday, April 14, 1998 6:57 PM
> 
> A few points:
> 1.  I do not think an entire kingdom would be turned into principalities.
 A
> viable group would be left to carry on with the kingdoms name, etc.  As
far as I
> know, I don't think this has ever happened.  Tho some kingdoms are a
former
> shadow of themselves (ie Atenveldt).
> 
> 2.  I would hope the BOD would listen to ALL groups and only form a
principality
> with the groups that all agree.  Bringing in a group that is against the
entire
> process will set up bad feelings between members of the group.  Not a
good way
> to start and not something I would like to see happen here in Ansteorra.
> 
> Meadhbh

============================================================================
Go to http://www.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.