SR - Fish & Ponds

[PKieferjr at aol.com]

In a message dated 98-06-25 11:04:11 EDT, you write:

<< The first argument says a principality push cannot have any "big fish in
 the big pond" as very vocal supporters, because it will look bad. Ok, so
 how is that rectified? Let's have the little fish support it, instead!
 
 Hmm... then we run into argument two. All those little fish must,
 perforce, want to be bigger fish, so again we should avoid the whole
 thing because if you are either a big fish or a little fish, you must
 want to do this for all the "wrong" reasons. So how can anyone support
 this without always looking like they have "wrong reasons"?
 
 Not getting my brain around this...
 
 Honos Servio,
 Lionardo Acquistapace, Bjornsborg
 Lenny Zimmermann, San Antonio
 	---------- >>

Yeah, it's got me confused, too.

So, which is it, people?  Pressure from up top, or from the "grass roots"
level?  Time to make up your minds.  Last thing we need is a "damned if you
do, damned if you don't" situation.

Lord Johann Kiefer Hayden (Paul E. Kiefer, Jr.)
============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.