SR - poll of paid members

[Brent & Susan Rachel]

Dottie Elliott wrote:

> Well, a formal poll could find out what borders are most popular. That
> would be one purpose of the poll and a helpful one at that. There is no
> reason a formal poll of what has been informally done (are you
> for/against a principality with borders a, borders b, etc) could not be
> conducted.

Actually, that is not possible either.

The thing that determines the borders is when each individual group polls within
itself and decides whether or not their *group* will go with a proposed
principality.

Then, all of the people within the new cluster of groups/proposed principality
are officially polled in the final, formal push for Principality status.

 Polling eveyone in the southern region about what borders they'd like would
therefore be kinda useless  :-)  as the results would be irrelevant.  I can
advocate any border arrangement I'd like, but the populace of the groups in that
are must agree to come along for the fun.

Therefore, I, too, must weigh in against any formal poll at this point, as I
have not seen any driving need for spending the money.  The principality is
still at grass roots level; still too early.  Naming the region doesn't require
it.

Kazimir Petrovich




============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.