SR - Principality law question

[Timothy A. McDaniel]

Finesse the issue, perhaps?  It could say that the Crown may invest
the incoming Coronet with the assistance of the outgoing Coronet, or
may delegate the entire task to the outgoing Coronet.  There might
still be disputes if both sets want to do the investing.  But it also
allows compromise (especially with the "assistance" word: it covers a
wide range of acts), and avoids rescheduling if one set suddenly can't
make it.

Or it could be "the Crown and/or the outgoing Coronet invest the
incoming Coronet" without giving primacy to either, let the first few
investitures work out procedures for various cases, and from then on
it's Ancient and Honorable Tradition.

There is some value in ambiguity.

Daniel de Lincolia
-- 
Tim McDaniel.   Reply to tmcd at crl.com;
    if that fail, tmcd at austin.ibm.com is my work account.
============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.