SR - ballots results

K.Drennan kdrennan at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 22 10:06:35 PST 1999


I think that this is the most rational thing I've heard since this debate
began!!! 
Thank You!! 

Wrenne


--- maddie teller-kook <meadhbh at io.com> wrote:
WELL SAID!  I agree 100% with this!  Thanks for the insight!

Meadhbh

-----Original Message-----
Behalf Of uriel
1. Is there some hidden agenda here that I'm just not getting - why else
are time frames so very tight? Why is there such an artificial urgency
being placed on choosing a regional name?

2. If a name is supposed to foster cohesiveness and a sense of place -
why does this effort seem to be counter-productive?.

3.  This name business has taken on a life way out of proportion to its
actual importance. Why is it the the on-line SR list is the only place I
ever hear about it?

It seems that this is the hobby-horse of a very few people.  The regional
name is just not something that comes up in conversation - it seems to be
a non-issue.
 
If, in the future, this region forms a principality, any name it has is
likely to stick (no matter how much you say a new name can be chosen). 
Let the cohesiveness, the esprit of a regional identity come first, that
will take the greater effort;  a good name will naturally follow.

Mistress Tamlin du Bois Vert, OL


=====
Great minds discuss ideas
Average minds discuss events
Small minds discuss people.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.



More information about the Southern mailing list