SR - ballots results
K.Drennan
kdrennan at yahoo.com
Mon Nov 22 10:06:35 PST 1999
I think that this is the most rational thing I've heard since this debate
began!!!
Thank You!!
Wrenne
--- maddie teller-kook <meadhbh at io.com> wrote:
WELL SAID! I agree 100% with this! Thanks for the insight!
Meadhbh
-----Original Message-----
Behalf Of uriel
1. Is there some hidden agenda here that I'm just not getting - why else
are time frames so very tight? Why is there such an artificial urgency
being placed on choosing a regional name?
2. If a name is supposed to foster cohesiveness and a sense of place -
why does this effort seem to be counter-productive?.
3. This name business has taken on a life way out of proportion to its
actual importance. Why is it the the on-line SR list is the only place I
ever hear about it?
It seems that this is the hobby-horse of a very few people. The regional
name is just not something that comes up in conversation - it seems to be
a non-issue.
If, in the future, this region forms a principality, any name it has is
likely to stick (no matter how much you say a new name can be chosen).
Let the cohesiveness, the esprit of a regional identity come first, that
will take the greater effort; a good name will naturally follow.
Mistress Tamlin du Bois Vert, OL
=====
Great minds discuss ideas
Average minds discuss events
Small minds discuss people.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
============================================================================
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
More information about the Southern
mailing list