Corpora (was Re: Selecting coronets by rapier)

[Burke McCrory]

At 08:38 AM 10/10/96 -0500, you wrote:
>>       2. General Considerations
>> 
>>          a. Boundaries.  Each branch must have established borders,
>>      enclosing a single, contiguous area.  At the Board's discretion,
>>      exceptions may be made in the case of overseas areas dependent
>>      upon kingdoms or principalities.
>> 
>> So the central/western principality, as proposed, would be the only
>> one of the three that COULDN'T go kingdom until one of the others did
>> first.  Unless the Board were petitioned to change or waive the above
>> rule, and it seems to me unlikely (with no real data, of course) that
>> they'd go for that.
>
>Well that depends on interreptation though.
>
>The northern and southern/eastern groups would still be a single
>contiguous area, they would just be a little odd shaped.
>
>At least the last time I checked, East Texas and Oklahoma could still
>touch.
>

This was in reference to the first proposed boundries.  North - Nortern
region and Western region down to Bonwicke, South - Area south and east of
I-20 and I-35 basicly south of dallas and east of I-35.  The Central would
have been everthing else from Tx - La border to Tx - NM border.  This was
the division that sparked the question about what if the Central went for
Kingdom first.  Now, in response to these concerns the current idea is a
I-35 split East - West with the North remaining the same.


>Ciao,
>
>-- 
>Phelim Uhtred Gervas  | "I want to be called. COTTONTIPS. There is something 
>Barony of Bryn Gwlad  |  graceful about that lady. A young woman bursting
with 
>House Flaming Dog     |  vigor. She blinked at the sudden light. She writes
>pug at pug.net           |  beautiful poems. When ever shall we meet again?"
>
>

Burke McCrory
Sir Burke Kyriell MacDonald
burkemc at ionet.net