ANSTHRLD - New device
Timothy A. McDaniel
tmcd at jump.net
Fri Apr 6 09:00:26 PDT 2001
> You are right in that the use of 'Rampant' would not be totally
> incorrect, but if you use it, you must then
> specifically blazon the wing position(s).
I didn't say it was incorrect at all.
In the blazons Laurel registered from 1990 on, I don't
see where they ever blazoned the wing positions.
> If we are back at assuming the default positions for all the body parts,
> then we should have left out both 'segreant' and 'rampant'
> respectively from our descriptions.
A point, yes ... but "wings elevated and addorsed" is rarely given
on bird postures where it's the default (rising, striking, rousant,
maybe others that I'm not remembering).
Daniel "here, nit nit nit" de Lincolia
Tim McDaniel is tmcd at jump.net; if that fail,
tmcd at us.ibm.com is my work account.
"To join the Clueless Club, send a followup to this message quoting everything
up to and including this sig!" -- Jukka.Korpela at hut.fi (Jukka Korpela)
Go to http://lists.ansteorra.org/lists.html to perform mailing list tasks.
More information about the Heralds