[ANSTHRLD] Heraldy Conflicts, help, please

[Robert Wade]

I knew I forgot to respond to something.  My proposed rebalzon, however, was "Or, on a lozenge azure a fret Or, all within an orle azure."
   
  Tostig

Tim McDaniel <tmcd at panix.com> wrote:
  On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Luciana Caterina di Borghese wrote:
> I have a submittor who is wishing to resubmit the following device:
>
> "Or, on a lozenge azure a fret Or within an orle azure."
>
> Mundane description:
> A gold fret upon a blue lozenge, all on a field of gold surrounded
> by an orle of blue.

Then the blazon's incorrect. If a primary charge X is charged with Y,
and Z is/are secondary on the field, "on an X [between/within] Z Y".
What you blazoned has the fret and the orle on the lozenge, which puts
a blue orle on a blue lozenge.

"Or, on a lozenge within an orle azure a fret Or."

> *The following badge associated with this name was registered in April of
> 1986 (via the West):?Or, on a lozenge azure, four more in cross argent.
> 1) Different charge on lozenge
> 2) Orle .*
>
> It looks clear to me, but I would feel a lot better to get
> confirmation on that one.

That one is indeed no conflict. (1) depends on RfS X.4.j.ii, knowing
that it qualifies under the limits there. Easier to note that the
tertiary groups differ both in type and number, so by RfS X.4.j.i,
that's a CD without reading up on the limits.

I didn't check for other conflicts, though.

Dankyn de Linccolne
-- 
Tim McDaniel, tmcd at panix.com
_______________________________________________
Heralds mailing list
Heralds at lists.ansteorra.org
http://lists.ansteorra.org/listinfo.cgi/heralds-ansteorra.org


       
---------------------------------
Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
 Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.